Riddle
me this, Batman: How do you solve a problem like E. Nygma?
Actually, this isn't
a riddle, but an engineering problem. The challenge is to write for an
antagonist who is supposed to be smart. Very smart. As in, the sort of
person who thinks Mensa is a support group for the semi-retarded. For
this means that he who writes a Riddler episode has the unenviable task
of himself trying to think on such a plane: He has to be as smart as the
Riddler so as to come up with a scheme and smarter than the Riddler so
as to catch him at the end.
There are ways of
cheating, of course. When the Riddler was running around in little green
tights, the script-writer could always just give him a few puns and have
him do something frankly impossible. (I don't know how he did it, we could
shake our heads afterward. But he is a genius.) Whatever merits this had
as comedy relief, it left him as only that: comedy relief. When those
behind BTAS decided to make him a serious adversary for Batman they made
him much more interesting, but they also lost the advantages that accrued
to the comedy angle. All in all, I prefer the BTAS interpretation, which
is why I think they did the right thing in choosing it. But that doesn't
mean they did the wisest thing, for they also took up an almost impossible
burden, a responsibility for thinking and writing for a one-man conceptual
carnival. Tom Stoppard or G. K. Chesterton might pull it off, but that's
pretty rarefied company.
Of course, it's sad
when bad things happen as a result of good choices, but we shouldn't be
surprised that odd things occur when we tangle with the prince of paradoxes.
God bless Messrs. Burnett, Dini, Rogel and Riba for their courage, even
if an episode like "Riddler's Reform" is deeply disappointing.
Here, a strong set-up
proves to have an astonishingly weak pay-off. Batman, suspicious to the
point of paranoia, sees plots and riddles in all the Riddler's seemingly
innocent remarks. The outlandish and outrageous readings he has to put
on the Riddler's words only heighten our conviction that this time Batman
is wrong. But in which direction? Is the Riddler really reformed (but
doomed, perhaps, to be persecuted back into crime)? Or is he only playing
an enormously misleading game against Batman? Either way, we are all primed
for seeing the Riddler undermine Batman in unexpected ways and relishing
the prospect of pleasant reversals and counter-reversals. How deflating,
then, for it to turn out that Batman was correctly divining and deciphering
the Riddler's moves from the start, especially since his readings were
so tortured and implausible to begin with. Batman is made to seem not
merely smart, but damn near infallible; we are left with the conviction
that he won only because the writers dealt from the bottom of the deck.
|